Home / Dynamics & FEM / Newmark-β & Response Spectrum
Newmark-β Integration & Response Spectrum
Step-by-step Newmark average acceleration method · Any arbitrary loading · Duhamel comparison · TBDY 2018 design spectrum → SDOF peak response
① Newmark-β Step-by-Step Integration
System & Loading
k=4π²→Tn=1s
Results
Natural period Tn (s)—
Time steps n—
β (Newmark)0.25 (avg. accel.)
γ (Newmark)0.50
Peak |u|_max (m)—
Duhamel |u|_max—
Newmark / Duhamel ratio—
Citations
Chopra §5.2Newmark (1959) β=¼ γ=½: Average acceleration method, unconditionally stable.
Eq.(5.4a)k̃ = k + γ/(βΔt)·c + 1/(βΔt²)·m — effective stiffness
Chopra §4.1Duhamel integral for comparison — exact for any loading
dynamics.js · Chopra (2012) §5.2 ·
Newmark vs Duhamel — Displacement u(t)
Step-by-Step Table (first 12 steps)
| i | t (s) | F (N) | u (m) | v (m/s) | a (m/s²) |
|---|
② SDOF Response from Design Spectrum (TBDY 2018)
Spectrum & SDOF
Peak SDOF Response
TA (s)—
TB (s)—
Sa(Tn) (m/s²)—
Sv(Tn) = Sa/ωn (m/s)—
Sd(Tn) = Sa/ωn² (m)—
Peak force F_max = m·Sa (kN)—
Citations
TBDY 2018 Md.2.3Sa(T): TBDY 2018 yatay elastik tasarım spektrumu
Chopra §6.1Sd=Sa/ωn² · Sv=Sa/ωn — deformation and pseudo-velocity spectra
TBDY 2018 · Chopra §6.1 ·
TBDY 2018 Design Spectrum Sa(T) — Selected Tn marked
Preliminary educational tool. Newmark average acceleration (β=¼, γ=½) is unconditionally stable for linear systems. Ss, S1 values from AFAD deprem.afad.gov.tr.